Is Flowerfell Frisk Good Or Bad

Howard Cosell

2 min read

·

02-12-2024

24

0

Share

Flowerfell Frisk, from the popular Undertale AU, is a character who defies simple categorization as purely "good" or "bad." Their actions, motivations, and the overall narrative surrounding them paint a far more nuanced picture, forcing us to confront the complexities of morality within a fictional world. This examination delves into Frisk's journey, analyzing their choices and their impact to arrive at a more comprehensive understanding.

The Weight of Sacrifice and Despair

Unlike the protagonist of the original Undertale, Flowerfell Frisk is burdened by the weight of repeated timelines and the horrors witnessed within them. Each failed attempt to complete a pacifist run results in not only Frisk's own suffering but the brutal deaths of their friends. This constant exposure to tragedy and despair fundamentally alters their perspective, shaping their actions in ways that challenge traditional notions of "good."

The Erosion of Innocence

The initial optimism and naivety characteristic of Undertale's Frisk is largely absent in their Flowerfell counterpart. The repeated trauma leads to a perceptible change; Frisk becomes emotionally withdrawn, cynical, and prone to darker actions born out of a desperate desire to escape the cycle of suffering. This shift is not a simple fall into evil but rather a heartbreaking consequence of unrelenting trauma.

The Morality of Survival

Many of Frisk's actions in Flowerfell can be interpreted through the lens of survival. Faced with a world filled with immense pain and suffering, the character makes difficult choices, some of which directly contradict the principles of pacifism. These choices, while morally ambiguous, can be argued as a desperate attempt to find a way out of an inescapable loop. Their actions are not driven by malice or a desire to inflict harm, but by a desperate need to break free from the agonizing repetition.

The Blurred Lines of Right and Wrong

Flowerfell highlights the grey areas of morality. The line between good and evil blurs as Frisk grapples with impossible choices, with every decision bearing profound consequences. The audience is forced to confront the question of whether survival justifies potentially morally questionable actions. There's no easy answer, and that ambiguity is a significant part of what makes Flowerfell Frisk such a compelling and memorable character.

Conclusion: Beyond Simple Labels

Ultimately, labeling Flowerfell Frisk as simply "good" or "bad" is reductive and ignores the profound complexity of their character arc. Their actions are a product of their environment, shaped by the brutal realities of repeated trauma and the desperation for an end to suffering. While some of their actions might be seen as morally questionable, understanding the context behind them provides a more nuanced perspective. Their story serves as a compelling exploration of morality, trauma, and the difficult choices we face when confronted with overwhelming despair.